FullEnrich: Review, Pricing and Alternatives

In the fast-paced world of B2B prospecting, accurate contact data is the lifeblood of success. Whether you’re a marketer crafting targeted campaigns, a salesperson chasing leads, or a recruiter hunting talent, having reliable emails and phone numbers can mean the difference between hitting your goals and falling flat. Enter FullEnrich, a tool that promises to deliver this data through its unique cascade enrichment method. But here’s the catch: its pricing—especially the one-time "onshot" payments—is so steep that many users, myself included, call it outright theft. Is it worth it? Or are there better options out there?In this 3500-word deep dive, we’ll unpack FullEnrich’s features, dissect its pricing (both monthly subscriptions and the jaw-dropping onshot costs), and weigh its real-world value. We’ll also explore why cascade enrichment is losing its edge and why Emelia.io blows it out of the water with affordability, accuracy, and extra features. For good measure, we’ll compare other alternatives like Snov.io, RocketReach, Lead411, Lusha, and Hunter.io, but spoiler alert: Emelia.io is the clear winner. By the end, you’ll know exactly why FullEnrich’s pricing is a scandal and how to get more bang for your buck.

FullEnrich is a SaaS platform built for B2B data enrichment. It’s designed to arm businesses with verified emails, phone numbers, and professional details, leveraging a cascade enrichment approach that queries over 15 data providers (think Hunter, Apollo, or Datagma) until it finds a match. The pitch? Maximum coverage, even for elusive prospects.

Key Features of FullEnrich

Here’s what FullEnrich brings to the table:

• Cascade Enrichment: Pulls data from multiple sources to boost hit rates.

• Chrome Extension: A one-click tool for scraping LinkedIn or Sales Navigator.

• Triple Email Validation: A three-step process to (supposedly) ensure deliverability.

• CRM Integrations: Works with HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive.

• Bulk Enrichment: Process large lists in one go.

• Live Company & Contact Enrichment: Real-time updates for fresher data (included in the Pro plan).

On paper, it’s a decent toolkit for teams needing quick, broad access to contact info. But as we’ll see, the shine wears off when you peek at the price tag—and the reality behind the features.

FullEnrich offers two pricing models: a monthly subscription and a one-time "onshot" payment. Both are tied to credits (1 credit = 1 enrichment), but the costs? Let’s just say they’ll make your wallet cry. Here’s the full rundown, straight from the source.

Monthly Subscription Pricing (Pro Plan)

The subscription model scales with credits per month. Here’s the breakdown:

• 1,000 credits/month:$55

• 1,500 credits/month: $79.5

• 2,000 credits/month: $104

• 5,000 credits/month: $255

• 10,000 credits/month: $499

• 15,000 credits/month: $720

• 25,000 credits/month: $1,150

• 50,000 credits/month: $1,950

The Pro plan’s flagship tier—highlighted as "Most Popular"—is $1,950 per month for 50,000 credits. That’s a hefty chunk of change, especially since unused credits don’t roll over. If your needs dip one month, tough luck—you’re still paying full price. For small teams, $55 for 1,000 credits might seem reasonable, but scale up to 50,000, and you’re shelling out nearly 2 grand. Ouch.

One-Time "Onshot" Pricing: Highway Robbery

Now, the real scandal: the one-time payment options. These let you buy credits upfront, but the prices are astronomical—and they expire after 6 months. Here’s the damage:

• 5,000 credits:$299

• 10,000 credits: $589

• 15,000 credits: $859

• 25,000 credits: $1,379

• 50,000 credits: $2,339

• 100,000 credits: $4,299

Yes, $4,299 for 100,000 credits. And you’ve got just 6 months to use them, or they vanish. Let’s break down the cost per credit:

• 5,000 credits ($299 ): $0.0598 /credit (~6 cents)

• 10,000 credits ($589 ): $0.0589 /credit (~5.89 cents)

• 15,000 credits ($859 ): $0.0573 /credit (~5.73 cents)

• 25,000 credits ($1,379 ): $0.0552 /credit (~5.52 cents)

• 50,000 credits ($2,339 ): $0.0468 /credit (~4.68 cents)

• 100,000 credits ($4,299 ): $0.04299 /credit (~4.3 cents)

The per-credit cost drops as you buy more, but the absolute price is insane. Dropping $4,299 on credits that might expire before you use them? That’s not a deal—it’s a rip-off. Imagine buying 100,000 credits, using half, and watching $2,000 evaporate because your campaign got delayed. Scandalous doesn’t even cover it.

Why So Expensive?

FullEnrich justifies this with its cascade enrichment method, querying multiple providers per request. More queries = higher costs, which they pass onto you. Plus, the "Unlimited Users" perk in the onshot plan sounds nice—until you realize most small teams don’t need it, and large ones can’t stomach the upfront hit. It’s a pricing model stuck in the past, gouging users for a process that’s no longer cutting-edge.

Feedback on FullEnrich is a mixed bag. Here’s the scoop:

The Good

• User-Friendly: The interface is intuitive, and the Chrome extension is a time-saver.

• Coverage: Cascade enrichment sometimes finds contacts others miss.

• Integrations: CRM syncing is smooth for organized workflows.

The Bad

• Pricing Outrage: Users slam the costs—especially the onshot model—as unjustifiable.

• Accuracy Gaps: Data can be outdated, especially outside the U.S. and Europe.

• Bounce Rates: Triple validation doesn’t always deliver; bounces still happen.

The Ugly

• Support Woes: Slow or unhelpful responses frustrate users.

• Credit Expiry: The 6-month limit on onshot credits feels predatory.

FullEnrich has its fans, but the consensus? You’re overpaying for inconsistent results.

Cascade enrichment used to be revolutionary. Years ago, when email finders were hit-or-miss, querying multiple sources was a smart workaround. But in 2023, it’s a relic. Here’s why:

The Downfall of Cascade Enrichment

1. Better Tech Exists: Tools like Emelia.io hit 99% accuracy with smarter algorithms and real-time data—no need for a scattershot approach.

2. Wasted Costs: Studies suggest 90% of hits come from 2-3 top providers. Paying for 15 is overkill.

3. Quality Risks: Secondary sources often deliver stale or wrong data, hurting your campaigns.

FullEnrich’s reliance on this method is like charging Ferrari prices for a horse and buggy. It’s time to move on.

Enter Emelia.io, the antidote to FullEnrich’s pricing nightmare. It’s cheaper, more accurate, and packed with features that make it a no-brainer for B2B prospecting.

Pricing That Doesn’t Sting

Emelia.io’s credit system is simple and wallet-friendly:

• 1,000 credits: $19

• 5,000 credits: $49

• 10,000 credits: $99

• 50,000 credits: $299

• 100,000 credits:$449

Credit usage:

• 1 credit = 1 email found

• 50 credits = 1 phone number

• 0.25 credits = 1 email verification

Compare that to FullEnrich:

• 1,000 emails: Emelia.io ($19) vs. FullEnrich subscription ($55) or onshot (~$589 for 10,000 credits).

• 50,000 emails: Emelia.io ($299) vs. FullEnrich subscription ($1,950) or onshot ($2,339).

For 50,000 emails, you’d save $1,651 monthly or $2,040 onshot with Emelia.io. That’s not a discount—it’s a lifeline.

Top-Notch Accuracy

Emelia.io claims 99% accuracy, and it delivers. Its database is constantly updated, avoiding the stale data traps of cascade methods. FullEnrich’s extra hits? Often 25-30% inaccurate, leading to bounces and wasted effort.

All-in-One Power

Emelia.io isn’t just an enrichment tool—it’s a prospecting powerhouse:

• Real-Time LinkedIn Scraping: Unlimited pulls from LinkedIn or Sales Navigator.

• Automation: Run LinkedIn and email campaigns in one place.

• Email Warmup: Boost deliverability effortlessly.

• CRM Sync: Integrates with your stack.

Why juggle multiple tools when Emelia.io does it all?

Credit Flexibility

• One-Time Purchase: Credits never expire.

• Subscription: Unused credits roll over while you’re subscribed.

No 6-month guillotine here—just practical options for any team.

Let’s stack them up:

Emelia.io dominates. FullEnrich’s only edge—slightly broader coverage—comes with a steep cost and questionable quality.

For fairness, here’s how FullEnrich stacks up against other players (though Emelia.io still shines):

1. Snov.io

• Pricing: $39/month (1,000 credits), $189/month (10,000 credits)

• Pros: Automation, decent value for small teams.

• Cons: 90-95% accuracy, monthly expiry.

• Vs. Emelia.io: Pricier ($39 vs $19) and less accurate.

2. RocketReach

RocketReach is a B2B prospecting platform that quickly finds emails, phone numbers, and social profiles for over 700 million professionals and 35 million companies. Its Chrome extension simplifies searches on LinkedIn and other sites, while integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, and Zapier streamline workflows. The tool offers advanced searches with precise filters (industry, location, role) and an API for automated data enrichment. Though its database is extensive, especially in the US, phone number accuracy can be inconsistent, and its credit-based pricing may become costly for heavy users. A limited free plan is available.

• Pricing: $99/month (200 lookups), $249/month (1,000 lookups)

• Pros: Huge database (700M contacts).

• Cons: Expensive, no automation.

• Vs. Emelia.io: Costs more ($249 vs $99 for 10,000 credits), less versatile.

3. Lead411

Lead411 is a B2B prospecting platform offering verified contact and company data, emphasizing accuracy. It includes intent signals and B2B email lists. More affordable than ZoomInfo, it’s ideal for growing teams, though its data volume is smaller. A Chrome extension simplifies LinkedIn prospecting.

• Pricing:$75/month (1,200 credits), 1$50/month (2,400 credits)

• Pros: Intent data for targeting.

• Cons: Dated UI, pricey at scale.

• Vs. Emelia.io: Higher cost ($75 vs $49 for ~5,000 credits), less flexible.

4. Lusha

Lusha is a simple, intuitive B2B prospecting tool, ideal for small teams. Its Chrome extension retrieves emails and phone numbers directly from LinkedIn. It offers intent signals and CRM integrations, but data accuracy can be inconsistent, and search filters are limited. A free plan is available.

Click here to compare other alternatives to Lusha!

• Pricing: $49/month (200 credits),$149/month (1,000 credits)

• Pros: 95% accuracy, simple to use.

• Cons: Limited credits, no automation.

• Vs. Emelia.io: More expensive ($149 vs. $19 for 1,000 credits).

5. Hunter.io

Hunter.io is a platform specialized in B2B email lookup and verification. It finds public email addresses linked to a domain and supports email campaigns. Simple and affordable, it’s ideal for targeted campaigns but lacks advanced features like data enrichment or intent signals.

• Pricing: $49 /month (500 searches), $99 /month (1,000 searches)

• Pros: Great domain search, clean UI.

• Cons: No scraping or automation.

• Vs. Emelia.io: Costlier ($99 vs $19 for 1,000 searches), narrower scope.-

• Find the best alternatives to Hunter.io in just one click!

FullEnrich’s cascade enrichment might’ve turned heads once, but today, it’s an overpriced dinosaur. Monthly subscriptions hit $1,950 for 50,000 credits, while onshot prices like $4,299 for 100,000 credits (expiring in 6 months!) are nothing short of daylight robbery. The features are decent, but the cost-to-value ratio is abysmal.Emelia.io, on the other hand, is a breath of fresh air:

• Cheap:$19 for 1,000 emails, $299 for 50,000.

• Accurate: 99% reliability, no junk data.

• Loaded: Scraping, automation, and more in one package.

• Fair: Credits that don’t vanish on you.

From startups to enterprises, Emelia.io delivers what FullEnrich can’t: top-tier prospecting without the gouging. Other tools like Snov.io or RocketReach have their niches, but none match Emelia.io’s all-around brilliance.Tired of overpaying for outdated tech? Give Emelia.io a spin and watch your prospecting soar!