FullEnrich and Lusha in short
- Where the data comes from
- FullEnrich queries other providers for each contact (“20+” on its home page, “25+” on its pricing page) and keeps no enrichment database; Lusha sells from its own, with 165 million verified emails and 117 million verified phone numbers claimed.
- What you pay for
- A found email costs 1 credit at both. A phone number costs 10 credits at FullEnrich (mobiles only, landlines free) and 5 at Lusha.
- Who can use it
- FullEnrich: unlimited users on every plan. Lusha: 1 seat on Starter, 2 on Pro, then $49.90 a month per extra seat.
- On LinkedIn
- Lusha has a Chrome and Edge extension for LinkedIn and Sales Navigator; FullEnrich closed its own in June 2025 and takes profile URLs in its app.
What a phone number found costs at FullEnrich, Lusha and Emelia
One person, monthly billing, phone numbers only: the smallest FullEnrich tier and Lusha step that cover the credits, against Emelia’s credit subscription alone, the smallest pack. A number takes 10 credits at FullEnrich and 5 at Lusha; Emelia searches several providers and refunds the credits when none is found. Each row compares the price of the numbers found.
Numbers revealed or found each month
20 numbers
100 numbers
200 numbers
1,000 numbers
2,000 numbers
FullEnrich prices checked on October 20, 2026, Lusha’s on October 8, 2026, before tax. FullEnrich and Lusha bill in dollars; Emelia’s prices follow your currency, and in euros a row only names a winner when it holds at any rate between €1 = $1 and €1 = $1.25.
Reading the phone rows
Between the two dollar-billed tools, FullEnrich costs less at 20, 100, 200 and 1,000 numbers a month, and Lusha at 2,000, where its Premium slider reaches 10,000 credits. Lusha’s price per credit is higher, but a number takes 5 credits there instead of 10.
What a credit buys is not quite the same: FullEnrich charges only for a mobile and returns a landline for free, while Lusha counts any phone number it reveals. Lusha also runs a Data Waterfall of outside providers when its own data has nothing, at 2 credits per email and 8 per phone, only when found.
Work emails at the same volume, and a team of three
An email costs 1 credit at all three, so the price of a tier decides. The last row adds people: Lusha bills seats beyond those included in a plan; FullEnrich and Emelia do not bill per user.
Work emails found a month, one person
1,000 emails
5,000 emails
10,000 emails
Three people sharing the credits
5,000 emails and 100 numbers
Billed monthly, prices excluding tax. Lusha: cheapest step that covers both the credits and the seats (2 included on Pro, 5 on Premium).
Emails and phones stored in a database, and a LinkedIn extension: only Lusha has them
This is the real split between the two. Lusha starts from its own data; FullEnrich starts from the contact you give it.
Searching before enriching
Lusha claims 515M+ contacts and 29M+ companies in its database, searchable for free; a credit is spent when you reveal a contact’s email or phone. FullEnrich’s Search lists 800 million people and 50 million companies, but without any email or phone number inside: those come from the waterfall once you enrich a result, at the same rates as any contact.
Working from LinkedIn
Lusha’s extension runs in Chrome and Edge on LinkedIn, Sales Navigator, Salesforce, HubSpot and Gmail, and claims 400,000 users. FullEnrich switched off its Listero extension on June 16, 2025, citing LinkedIn’s tighter rules; a profile is now enriched by pasting its URL into the app.
Emelia keeps a Chrome extension on LinkedIn: on a profile, it finds the person’s email and phone number, charged in credits only when found, and adds them to a campaign.
Credits that expire, on both sides
FullEnrich carries unused monthly credits over for 3 months and yearly ones for 12; its help centre adds that once a cancelled subscription ends, the remaining credits expire. Lusha’s pricing page and help centre let monthly Pro and Premium plans carry up to 2 times the monthly quota while its terms say unused credits expire at the end of each term; credits are lost when you cancel and when you move to a higher plan.
Emelia’s credits stay valid 12 months after purchase, and cancelling does not take them away.
FullEnrich or Lusha: paying per result, or browsing a database first
If what you need is the email and the mobile of people you already know, and then a conversation with them, Emelia finds both with a credit pack from $19 a month and, with a plan, sends the email and LinkedIn sequence from the same tool.
Between the two others, the starting point is what differs. FullEnrich is built around lists you bring, with any number of users and no seat to buy, and nothing to search before enriching. Lusha is built around its database and its LinkedIn extension, with seats billed beyond those of the plan.
FullEnrich vs Lusha: questions
In part. Lusha answers from its own database first and, through its Data Waterfall, can query outside providers when that fails, at 2 credits per email and 8 per phone, only when something is found. FullEnrich has no database for enrichment: every lookup goes through its providers.
For the same data, FullEnrich bills no seat: a team of three spending 5,000 emails and 100 numbers a month pays $499 there, against $606.15 at Lusha, extra seat included. Emelia does not bill per user either: $99 for the same month.
FullEnrich gives 50 credits once, valid 30 days, without a card. Lusha has a Free plan of 40 credits a month that does not expire, for one user with a work email. On Emelia’s side, a work email unlocks 20 credits when you sign up, on top of a 7-day trial with no card asked.
Emelia features: Email finder · Emelia pricing
Emelia is a FullEnrich competitor. We have tried to stay fair: every figure about FullEnrich comes from its own website or public review sites.
